In the modern dating era, the role of technology, particularly texting, has become an integral part of romantic communication and the courtship process.
Texting is a convenient way to stay connected and gauge someone’s interest. However, in this age where every typed message carries a weight of interpretation, the question often arises: is their seemingly lackluster texting indicative of being a “bad texter,” or could it signal that they are just not interested?
These shorthand exchanges have replaced traditional cues that once helped individuals assess interest and compatibility.
Christina recently went on a date with a charming man called Jordan, who she met at work and often sees in the office. They had a great time in person, and Christina was hopeful about the possibility of a second date. However, her excitement started to dwindle when she noticed that Jordan’s text responses were often delayed, sometimes hours or even days in between. Christina found herself constantly checking her phone, hoping for a reply, only to be met with silence. This pattern of intermittent communication left her wondering if he was genuinely interested in pursuing a relationship with her. The uncertainty made her question whether his occasional delayed response or brief replies signified discomfort with texting or a more significant issue—a lack of interest on his part.
As we dissect Christina’s dilemma, let’s explore the differences between a “bad texter” and a potential lack of romantic interest.
Things to consider before jumping to conclusions
People have different communication styles
Not everyone communicates in the same way. Thus, preferences and expectations around texting can vary.
Christina prefers lengthy messages and frequent, detailed text conversations. Whereas, she remembered Jordan saying that he prefers speaking in person or on the phone. She thought this could be the reason for him keeping their texting interactions concise and infrequent.
Individuals have different approaches to staying connected, and what might seem unresponsive to one person could be perfectly normal for another.
Assuming a universal standard for responsiveness can lead to misunderstandings. Understanding and respecting these differences in communication styles is vital to avoid misinterpreting someone’s intentions based solely on their texting habits.
Texting isn’t everything
In the age of digital communication, it is easy to fall into the trap of relying solely on texting to maintain relationships. However, texting is just one tool for staying connected and not the sole indicator of someone’s interest.
Relying solely on text messages to gauge someone’s level of interest oversimplifies the complexities of human communication and can lead to misconceptions.
People express themselves differently through various channels, such as face-to-face conversations, phone calls, shared activities, and spending quality time together.
Considering the individual’s non-verbal cues and their engagement across different communication methods provides a more comprehensive view of their level of interest.
They could genuinely be busy
Consider the possibility that they might be occupied with other responsibilities. Their delayed responses may not reflect a lack of interest, but rather the need to prioritize other responsibilities and obligations.
During Christina's date with Jordan, he talked about his busy schedule, demanding job, and personal commitments.
People have schedules filled with work, school, family, and personal pursuits that can impact their availability to engage in frequent text conversations.
It is unrealistic to expect that someone will always be available to text back immediately.
Both parties should communicate openly about their schedules and expectations and be understanding of each other’s time constraints.
Are you asking for too much?
It is important to have realistic expectations about your partner’s availability and ability to respond to texts promptly. If your expectations are overly demanding or unrealistic, it can lead to frustration and disappointment for both individuals.
Reflect on your own expectations and consider if they align with realistic communication norms. Consider whether what you class as little contact is something other people would agree with (e.g., is it reasonable to expect a response within an hour of your message?).
Asking for too much in terms of constant updates or immediate responses can create unnecessary pressure.
Healthy communication involves understanding each other’s comfort levels and finding a middle ground that respects both individuals’ boundaries and preferences.
Signs that they may not be interested
Bear in mind that the following suggestions are just ideas and there could be any number of reasons as to why someone is displaying these texting behaviors.
They take way too long to reply
While occasional delays are normal, consistently taking an unusually long time to reply can be a sign that they are losing interest.
Jordan’s excessive delays in responding made Christina feel like he lacked enthusiasm and investment in their conversation. Since Jordan repeatedly took days to respond to her messages, it looked like he was not prioritizing communication with Christina or that his romantic interest had subsided.
Although everyone has different communication styles, frequent, prolonged response times in texting (without any explanation or reassurance that they are still interested) can be a sign of romantic disinterest.
You always lead the conversation
If you find yourself consistently steering the conversation without reciprocal engagement, it can signal a lack of interest or engagement from the other person.
In balanced interactions, both parties actively contribute to discussions, showing mutual enthusiasm (Knapp & Daly, 2016).
Christina consistently took the lead in initiating conversations with Jordan by texting him first, asking questions, and keeping the dialogue flowing. This could indicate that Jordan:
- was not actively contributing to the relationship’s growth;
- may not have been as invested in maintaining their connection;
- was showing a lack of initiative or genuine curiosity.
This imbalance in conversational effort created a sense of one-sidedness in their relationship.
They don’t ask questions about your life
Meaningful conversations involve reciprocal interest and curiosity (Sprecher & Hendrick, 2004).
Jordan consistently failed to inquire about Christina’s day, thoughts, feelings, experiences, or activities, which indicated a lack of genuine interest on his part. This lack of inquisitiveness suggests a limited desire to deepen their connection. Jordan’s absence of questions suggested disinterest in understanding Christina’s world, prompting concerns about whether the relationship held the depth and mutual engagement typically associated with budding romantic connections.
A genuine connection involves curiosity about each other’s experiences, emotions, and aspirations. If this curiosity is one-sided, and your attempts to share personal details are not reciprocated with inquiries about your life, it might signal a lack of emotional investment.
They never text you first
Initiating communication is a key aspect of expressing interest. Consistently being the one to initiate conversations can be disheartening, hinting at potential disinterest from the other person.
In romantic dynamics, mutual enthusiasm usually involves both parties taking the initiative to connect.
If you find yourself constantly initiating conversations without reciprocation, it may suggest a lack of proactive engagement or eagerness to communicate on their part.
If one person often waits for the other to initiate contact, it can suggest passivity or disinterest in maintaining the connection. This one-sided pattern of communication can leave the initiator questioning the reciprocity of the other person’s feelings.
Their replies are very short/low-Effort
Frequently receiving short, perfunctory text replies may indicate a lack of emotional investment or interest in a romantic relationship.
Meaningful conversations often involve thoughtful responses, and when replies consistently lack substance, depth, or engagement, it can create doubt about the other person’s level of commitment.
For example, imagine you have sent a message to someone you are dating asking them if they want to go out for dinner on Friday.
A meaningful response may look something like this:
- ‘Sure, Friday night works for me. Did you have a certain restaurant in mind?’ or
- ‘That sounds great. I’m looking forward to seeing you!’
However, a low-effort response may look something like this:
- ‘OK’ or
- ‘Whatever you want.’
If someone consistently responds with one-word answers, uses minimal punctuation, or avoids asking questions, it suggests a lack of genuine effort and a potential disinterest in carrying on the conversation.
The brevity and minimal effort in responses may suggest a reluctance to invest time or energy in the interaction, potentially signaling a lack of romantic interest.
They are usually active on their phone
Christina noticed that Jordan often checks/uses his phone at work and when he is with her. However, he only took a few seconds to write brief and unenthusiastic text responses, suggesting that he was not prioritizing communication with Christina. Additionally, Christina observed that Jordan was sometimes online on WhatsApp or posting on social media whilst not responding to her messages. Thus, Christina wondered whether he was actively invested in maintaining their connection. His lack of effort in responses suggested reluctance to engage in meaningful text conversations. However, excessive texting can create a false sense of intimacy by substituting digital communication for in-person connection. Therefore, Jordan could possibly prefer phone/video calls and in-person dates with prospective partners.
How to get clarity
Have an open conversation
By openly discussing your expectations and their communication style, you can gain valuable insights into their level of interest and work together to find a mutually satisfying approach to texting.
Christina initiated a direct but respectful conversation with Jordan about their communication preferences. She expressed her concerns about his texting behavior and how it made her feel. She discussed her feelings, shared her expectations, and inquired about his. This dialogue allowed them both to openly discuss their texting habits and relationship intentions.
It is important to approach such conversations with a non-accusatory tone and a willingness to listen to the person’s perspective.
Below are a couple of examples of how to start this conversation:
- “I wanted to discuss our texting habits and make sure we’re on the same page about communication. I tend to be more of a frequent texter, but I’ve noticed your responses can be pretty short at times. How do you prefer to handle texting on a normal day?”
- “I really enjoy our conversations, but sometimes your brief texts make me unsure if you’re interested in keeping the dialogue going. I’d love it if we could share what works best for each of us so there’s no confusion. What are your thoughts?”
Pay attention to other signs of interest
Texting habits are not the sole indicator of someone’s interest. Paying close attention to other aspects of their behavior and interactions can offer a more comprehensive understanding of their feelings and intentions.
Assess their:
- non-verbal cues, such as body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, and overall engagement during face-to-face interactions;
- willingness to spend time with you, engage in worthwhile conversations, and show affection;
- efforts to make you feel valued.
If they consistently show affection, initiate plans, and make you feel appreciated, their slow texting responses may not necessarily indicate a lack of interest. It may be that their love language is different to your own.
For example:
- They remember important details about you and check in to see how significant events went. For example, “I know you have that big presentation at work today. Hope it went amazing!”
- They initiate date ideas based on things you have mentioned liking. For example, planning a weekend kayaking trip since you shared your love of paddling.
However, if their texting habits are paired with a lack of effort in other areas, it could be a sign that their romantic interest is fading.
For example:
- Frequently showing up late for plans you have together or canceling last minute.
- Rarely being the one to initiate dates or conversations via text/call. Always leaving you to make the effort.
- Forgetting important events, milestones, or details you have shared about loved ones.
Understand the times they are busy
Respectful communication involves recognizing each other’s time constraints and being understanding when responses are not immediate.
Understanding your partner’s schedule and commitments can provide valuable context for their texting habits.
If you know Monday mornings tend to be hectic for them as they ramp up for the work week or that weekday evenings are filled with time for their sporting hobbies, you can anticipate delays during those windows.
Knowing their schedule also enables you to plan your more meaningful, engaging conversations for when you both have more free time to dedicate. For example, setting up a weekend brunch date to catch up in depth or calling Thursday nights when you’re both usually unwinding at home.
Adjusting conversations around busier periods and intentionally connecting during downtime demonstrates consideration while still allowing space for quality interaction.
Suggest alternative communication styles
Suggesting alternative communication methods such as phone calls, video chats, or in-person meetings can provide alternative avenues for connection.
Understanding each other’s preferences allows both parties to communicate in a way that feels comfortable and natural.
Since Jordan said he preferred phone calls between in-person meetings, Christina proposed scheduling regular phone calls. This helped them connect more deeply and allowed for more nuanced expressions of affection. This approach helped bypass the limitations of texting, providing a more accurate reflection of Jordan’s enthusiasm and interest in her.
Expressing your preference for face-to-face interactions can help gauge their willingness to prioritize in-person communication and develop a stronger bond.
FAQs:
Why are they bad at texting but good at communicating in person?
Texting does not always reflect a person’s true communication skills or level of interest.
Individuals who excel in face-to-face interactions might struggle to convey the same warmth through text.
They might find texting impersonal and feel more comfortable and expressive when communicating face-to-face, allowing them to convey their emotions and thoughts more effectively.
Furthermore, some people simply do not enjoy texting, finding it tedious or time-consuming. In addition, factors like typing speed or a preference for real-time dialogue (e.g., phone calls) can contribute to being a “bad texter.”
Despite their texting habits, their ability to communicate effectively in person can be a strong indicator of their interest and engagement in the relationship.
Is being a bad texter always a red flag?
Poor texting habits can be frustrating, but they are not always a red flag. Some people prefer different communication styles or may not have as much time to text regularly.
Texting habits are influenced by various factors, including personality, lifestyle, busy schedules, and communication preferences.
Avoid jumping to conclusions based solely on texting habits. Consider the broader context of the relationship by examining their actions and additional signs of interest.
If they consistently make an effort to connect and express their feelings in other ways, being a bad texter may not be a cause for concern.
However, if their poor texting is paired with a lack of effort in other areas of the relationship, it could be a sign of disinterest or a fundamental difference in communication preferences.
I’ve been called a bad texter–what should I do?
If you have received feedback about being a bad texter, engage in an open and honest conversation about both of your preferred communication styles.
Acknowledge their perspective and express your willingness to improve your texting habits. Use the feedback as an opportunity to find common ground and establish a communication style that works for both of you.
Ask for specific feedback about what they find challenging or how you can make the texting experience more enjoyable for them. This proactive approach demonstrates that you value their feelings and preferences.
If they prefer more frequent or detailed replies, consider adjusting your texting style accordingly. Alternatively, suggest alternative communication methods, such as phone calls or video chats, to complement your texting interactions.
References
Boley, M. (2023, April 10). “I’m Bad at Texting” — Is It Legit or a Red Flag? – Love and Other Things – Medium. Medium. https://medium.com/love-and-other-things/im-bad-at-texting-is-it-legit-or-a-red-flag-b4666ec68a3f
Chet. (2022, April 27). “Bad texter” or just not that into you? Get the Guy. https://matthewhussey.com/blog/bad-texter-or-just-not-that-into-you/
Hardwick, C. (2023, June 15). Is He Really A Bad Texter Or Is He Just Not Into You? Bolde. https://www.bolde.com/really-bad-texter-not-into-you/
Hoff, V. (2022, August 27). The psychology of being a bad texter. TheThirty. https://thethirty.whowhatwear.com/bad-texter
Quinn, J. (2023, May 15). How much of communication is nonverbal? | UT Permian Basin Online. The University of Texas Permian Basin | UTPB. https://online.utpb.edu/about-us/articles/communication/how-much-of-communication-is-nonverbal/
Ruby. (2023, March 13). Is she bad at texting or not interested in you? Good Gentleman. https://goodgentleman.com/is-she-bad-at-texting-or-not-interested-in-you/
Sprecher, S., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Self-Disclosure in Intimate Relationships: Associations With Individual and Relationship Characteristics Over Time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803
Steele, J. (2021, March 8). Spotting The Difference Between A Bad Texter And Someone Who Just Isn’t Interested. Thisiswhyimsingle. https://www.thisiswhyimsingle.com/relationships/spotting-the-difference-between-a-bad-texter-and-someone-who-just-isnt-interested/
Wrench, J. S. (n.d.). Chapter 1: Introduction to Human Communication. Pressbooks. https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/interpersonalcommunication/chapter/1/
